Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validity of spot urine samples for estimating systemic fluoride exposure in children across diverse fluoridation modalities

  • Fatemeh Vida Zohoori
  • , Marilia Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf
  • , Anne Maguire
  • , Roy Sanderson
  • , Rodrigo A. Giacaman
  • , Stefania Martignon
  • , Edgar O. Beltran
  • , Yaysa Vasquez
  • , Fatemeh Eskandari
  • , Jelena Kronic
  • , Karla Gambetta-Tessini
  • , Flavia Mauad Levy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reliable biomarkers are essential for assessing children's fluoride exposure, yet 24-h urinary fluoride excretion (24 h-UFE), the gold standard, is logistically challenging to collect. The validity of spot urine samples as a proxy across fluoridation modalities has not been evaluated. This study is the first to assess the predictive accuracy of spot urine fluoride concentration (U FC), creatinine-adjusted (U F/CR), and specific gravity-adjusted (U F/SG) for estimating 24 h-UFE across multiple fluoride exposure modalities.

METHODS: In this multi-modality observational study, 178 children aged 4-6 years residing in regions with different fluoride modalities were included: water fluoridation (UK, Brazil), salt fluoridation (Colombia), milk fluoridation (Chile), and non-fluoridated areas (UK, Chile). Each child provided one 24-h urine sample and four spot samples during a separate session (post-breakfast, post-lunch, before bedtime, first morning void). Linear regression models assessed the predictive validity of U FC, U F/CR, and U F/SG.

RESULTS: Mean urinary fluoride ranged 0.48-1.38 mg/L (U FC), 1.13-2.30 mg/g (U F/CR), and 0.55-1.70 mg/L (U F/SG). UFC showed the strongest association with 24 h-UFE (mean R 2 = 77%), particularly in water-fluoridated areas (up to 85%). U F/CR and U F/SG correlations were weaker (mean R 2 = 58% and 61%). Accuracy improved when multiple spot samples were used. Timing of peak fluoride excretion varied: post-breakfast (water), post-lunch (salt), first morning void (milk and non-fluoridated areas).

CONCLUSION: Spot U FC provides a practical alternative for population-level monitoring of fluoride exposure in children, although accuracy depends on sampling time and fluoridation modality. This multi-modality study demonstrates variability in fluoride excretion across sources and informs optimized sampling strategies for public health surveillance.

Original languageEnglish
Article number114795
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Volume274
Early online date6 Apr 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of spot urine samples for estimating systemic fluoride exposure in children across diverse fluoridation modalities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this