“What’s the Point when you only lose a pound?” Reasons for Attrition from a Multi-component Childhood Obesity Treatment Interventions: A Qualitative Inquiry.

Leanne Staniford, Robert Copeland, Jeff Breckon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study explored the causes of drop-out from a community-based multi-component childhood obesity treatment intervention (MCTI), considering parent and child perspectives in order to develop future interventions which manage potential attrition more effectively. Semi-structured interviews explored attrition amongst a sample of children (n = 10) and their parents (n = 10) who dropped out of a community-based MCTI. Parents and children highlighted psychological and motivational issues (e.g. misaligned expectations, lack of desire to make behaviour changes and perceived costs of change outweigh the perceived gains) as the driving factor for their attrition alongside attitudinal, environmental, interpersonal and treatment variables. The complexity and interaction of factors associated with attrition identified in this study points to the challenges associated with reducing drop-out in MCTI’s. The views of families’ should be a key consideration in the design and implementation of treatment interventions to harness and sustain commitment to the treatment process.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)382-397
JournalQualitiative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“What’s the Point when you only lose a pound?” Reasons for Attrition from a Multi-component Childhood Obesity Treatment Interventions: A Qualitative Inquiry.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this