When to (or not to) trust intelligent machines: Insights from an evolutionary game theory analysis of trust in repeated games

The Anh Han, Cedric Perret, Simon T. Powers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The actions of intelligent agents, such as chatbots, recommender systems, and virtual assistants are typically not fully transparent to the user. Consequently, using such an agent involves the user exposing themselves to the risk that the agent may act in a way opposed to the user’s goals. It is often argued that people use trust as a cognitive shortcut to reduce the complexity of such interactions. Here we formalise this by using the methods of evolutionary game theory to study the viability of trust-based strategies in repeated games. These are reciprocal strategies that cooperate as long as the other player is observed to be cooperating. Unlike classic reciprocal strategies, once mutual cooperation has been observed for a threshold number of rounds they stop checking their co-player’s behaviour every round, and instead only check with some probability. By doing so, they reduce the opportunity cost of verifying whether the action of their co-player was actually cooperative. We demonstrate that these trust-based strategies can outcompete strategies that are always conditional, such as Tit-for-Tat, when the opportunity cost is non-negligible. We argue that this cost is likely to be greater when the interaction is between people and intelligent agents, because of the reduced transparency of the agent. Consequently, we expect people to use trust-based strategies more frequently in interactions with intelligent agents. Our results provide new, important insights into the design of mechanisms for facilitating interactions between humans and intelligent agents, where trust is an essential factor.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-124
Number of pages14
JournalCognitive Systems Research
Volume68
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Apr 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank all members of the TIM 2019 Workshop, particularly Lukas Esterle and Stephen Marsh, for useful discussion. TAH and CP are supported by Future of Life Institute (grant RFP2-154). TAH is also supported by a Leverhulme Research Fellowship (RF-2020-603/9).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When to (or not to) trust intelligent machines: Insights from an evolutionary game theory analysis of trust in repeated games'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this